This book is available for 34.95 dollars (plus shipping and taxes) at:
Amazon or
Overseas Link Inc 1006 Merrywood Dr Edison, NJ 08817 USA Tel: 732-393-0132 Contact person: Ms Shivani Narang Email:snarang.overseaslink@gmail.comOrder here. Below is the introduction to the text. |

Probability theory is a fundamental pillar of modern mathematics with
relations to other mathematical areas like algebra, topology, analysis,
geometry or dynamical systems. As with any fundamental mathematical construction, the theory
starts by adding more structure to a set . In a similar way as introducing
algebraic operations, a topology, or a time evolution on a set, probability theory
adds a **measure theoretical structure** to which generalizes "counting" on
finite sets: in order to measure the **probability** of a subset
, one
singles out a class of subsets , on which one can hope to do so.
This leads to the notion of a -algebra . It is a set of subsets of
in which on can perform finitely or **countably many** operations like
taking unions, complements or intersections.
The elements in are called **events**. If a point in the "laboratory"
denotes an "experiment", an "event" is a subset of , for which
one can assign a probability
. For example, if
, the event happens with probability .
If , the event takes place almost certainly. The **probability
measure** has to satisfy obvious properties like that the **union** of two
disjoint events satisfies
or that the **complement** of an event has the probability
.
With a probability space
alone, there is already some interesting mathematics:
one has for example the **combinatorial problem** to find the probabilities of events
like the event to get a "royal flush" in poker.
If is a subset of an Euclidean space like the plane,
for a suitable nonnegative **function** , we are led to **integration problems**
in calculus. Actually, in many applications, the probability space is part of
Euclidean space and the -algebra is the smallest
which contains all **open sets**. It is called the **Borel -algebra**.
An important example is the Borel -algebra on the real line.

Given a probability space
, one can define **random variables** .
A random variable is a function from to the real line which is **measurable**
in the sense that the inverse of a measurable Borel set in is in .
The interpretation is that if is an **experiment**, then measures an
**observable quantity** of the experiment.
The technical condition of measurability resembles the notion of a **continuity** for a
function from a topological space
to the topological
space . A function is continuous if
for all open sets .
In probability theory, where functions are often denoted with capital letters, like ,
a random variable is measurable if
for all Borel sets .
Any continuous function is measurable for the Borel -algebra. As in calculus, where
one does not have to worry about continuity most of the time, also in probability theory, one
often does not have to sweat about measurability issues. Indeed, one could suspect that notions like
-algebras or measurability were introduced by mathematicians to scare
normal folks away from their realms. This is not the case. Serious issues are avoided with those constructions.
Mathematics is eternal: a once established result will be true also
in thousands of years. A theory in which one could prove a theorem as well as its negation would be worthless:
it would formally allow to prove any other result, whether true or false. So, these notions
are not only introduced to keep the theory "clean", they are essential for the "survival" of the theory.
We give some examples of "paradoxes" to illustrate the need for building a careful theory.
Back to the fundamental notion of random variables: because they are just
functions, one can add and multiply them by defining
or
. Random variables form so an **algebra** .
The **expectation** of a random variable is denoted by if it exists. It is a real number
which indicates the "mean" or "average" of the observation . It is the value, one would **expect**
to measure in the experiment. If is the random variable which has the value
if is in the
event and if is not in the event , then the expectation of is just the
probability of . The constant random variable has the expectation .
These two basic examples as well as the **linearity** requirement
determine the
expectation for all random variables in the algebra :
first one defines expectation for finite sums
called
**elementary random variables**,
which approximate general measurable functions. Extending the expectation to a subset
of the entire algebra is part of **integration theory**. While in calculus,
one can live with the **Riemann integral** on the real line,
which defines the integral by **Riemann sums**
, the integral
defined in measure theory is the **Lebesgue integral**. The later is
more fundamental and probability theory
is a major motivator for using it. It allows to make statements like that the
probability of the set of real numbers with periodic decimal expansion
has probability . In general, the probability of
is the expectation of the random variable
.
In calculus, the integral
would not be defined because a Riemann integral can
give or depending on how the Riemann approximation is done.
Probability theory allows to **introduce** the Lebesgue integral
by defining
as the limit of
for , where
are **random uniformly distributed points** in the interval . This **Monte Carlo
definition** of the Lebesgue integral is based on the **law of large numbers** and is
as intuitive to state as the Riemann integral
which is the limit of
for .

With the fundamental notion of expectation one can define the **variance**,
and the **standard deviation**
of a random variable for which
. One can also look at the
**covariance**
of two random variables for which
. The **correlation**
of
two random variables with positive variance is a number which tells how much the random variable
is related to the random variable . If is interpreted as an **inner product**, then the
standard deviation is the **length** of and the
correlation has the geometric interpretation as , where
is the **angle** between the centered random variables
and .
For example, if , then for some , if , they
are anti-parallel. If the correlation is zero, the geometric interpretation is
that the two random variables are **perpendicular**. Decorrelated random variables still can have relations
to each other but if for any measurable real functions and , the random variables
and are uncorrelated, then the random variables are **independent**.

A random variable can be described well by its **distribution function**
. This is a real-valued function defined as
on , where
is the event of all experiments satisfying
. The distribution
function does not encode the internal structure of the random variable ; it does not reveal the
structure of the probability space for example.
But the function allows the construction of a probability space with
exactly this distribution function. There are two important types of distributions, **continuous
distributions** with a **probability density function** and **discrete distributions**
for which is piecewise constant. An example of a continuous distribution is
the **standard normal distribution**, where
. One can characterize it
as the distribution with maximal **entropy**
among all distributions which have zero mean and variance . An example of a discrete
distribution is the **Poisson distribution**
on
.
One can describe random variables by their **moment generating functions**
or
by their **characteristic function**
. The later is the
Fourier transform of the **law** which is a measure on the real line .

The law of the random variable is a probability measure on the real line satisfying
. By the
Lebesgue decomposition theorem, one can decompose any measure into a **discrete part** ,
an absolutely continuous part and a **singular continuous part** .
Random variables for which is a discrete measure are called **discrete random variables**,
random variables with a continuous law are called **continuous random variables**. Traditionally,
these two type of random variables are the most important ones. But singular continuous random variables
appear too: in spectral theory, dynamical systems or fractal geometry.
Of course, the law of a random variable does not need to be pure. It can mix the three types.
A random variable can be mixed discrete and continuous for example.

Inequalities play an important role in probability theory.
The **Chebychev inequality**
is used very often. It is a special case of the **Chebychev-Markov inequality**
for monotone nonnegative functions .
Other inequalities are the **Jensen inequality**
for convex functions ,
the **Minkowski inequality**
or
the **Hölder inequality**
for random variables, , for which
are finite. Any inequality which appears in analysis can be useful
in the toolbox of probability theory.

**Independence** is an central notion in probability theory. Two events are called
**independent**, if
. An arbitrary set of events is
called independent, if for any finite subset of them, the probability of their intersection
is the product of their probabilities. Two -algebras are called
independent, if for any pair
, the events are
independent. Two random variables are independent, if they generate independent
-algebras. It is enough to check that the events
and
are independent for all intervals and . One should think of
independent random variables as two aspects of the laboratory which do not influence each other.
Each event
is independent of the event
.
While the distribution function
of the sum of two independent random variables is a **convolution**
,
the **moment generating functions** and **characteristic functions** satisfy the formulas
and
. These identities
make valuable tools to compute the distribution of
an arbitrary finite sum of independent random variables.

Independence can also be explained using **conditional probability**
with respect to an event of positive probability: the
conditional probability
of is the probability that happens when we know that takes place.
If is independent of , then
but in general, the
conditional probability is larger.
The notion of conditional probability leads to the important notion of **conditional expectation**
of a random variable with respect to some sub--algebra of the
algebra ; it is a new
random variable which is -measurable. For , it is the random variable itself,
for the trivial algebra
, we obtain the usual expectation
. If
is generated by a finite partition
of of pairwise disjoint sets covering
, then is piecewise constant on the sets and the value on is
the average value of on . If is the -algebra of an independent random
variable , then
. In general, the
conditional expectation with respect to is a new random variable obtained by averaging
on the elements of . One has
for some function , extreme cases being
.
An illustrative example is the situation where is a continuous function on the unit square
with as a probability measure and where . In that case,
is a function of alone, given by
.
This is called **a conditional integral**.

A set
of random variables defines a **stochastic process**.
The variable
is a parameter called "time". Stochastic processes are to probability theory what
**differential equations** are to **calculus**.
An example is a family of random variables which evolve with **discrete time** .
Deterministic dynamical system theory branches into
**discrete time systems**, the iteration of maps and **continuous time systems**, the theory of
ordinary and partial **differential equations**. Similarly, in probability theory,
one distinguishes between
**discrete time stochastic processes** and **continuous time stochastic processes**.
A discrete time stochastic process is a sequence of random variables with certain properties.
An important example is when are independent, identically
distributed random variables. A continuous time stochastic process is given by a family
of random variables , where is **real time**. An example is a solution of a
**stochastic differential equation**. With more general time like or random
variables are called **random fields** which play a role in statistical physics. Examples of
such processes are **percolation** processes.

While one can realize every discrete time stochastic process by a measure-preserving
transformation
and
, probability theory
often focuses a special subclass of systems called **martingales**, where one has a
filtration
of -algebras such that is -measurable and
, where
is the **conditional expectation**
with respect to the sub-algebra . Martingales are a powerful generalization of the **random
walk**, the process of summing up IID random variables with zero mean.
Similar as ergodic theory, martingale theory is a natural extension of
probability theory and has many applications.

The language of probability fits well into the **classical theory of dynamical systems**.
For example, the **ergodic theorem of Birkhoff** for measure-preserving transformations
has as a special case the **law of large numbers** which describes the average of partial
sums of random variables
. There are different versions of the law of
large numbers. "Weak laws" make statements about **convergence in probability**, "strong laws"
make statements about **almost everywhere convergence**.
There are versions of the law of large numbers for which the random variables do not need to
have a common distribution and which go beyond Birkhoff's theorem. An other important theorem is the
**central limit theorem** which shows that
normalized to have zero
mean and variance converges **in law** to the normal distribution or the
**law of the iterated logarithm** which says that for centered independent and identically
distributed , the scaled sum
has accumulation points in the interval
if
and is the standard deviation of .
While stating the weak and strong law of large numbers and the central limit theorem,
different convergence notions for random variables appear: **almost sure convergence** is the
strongest, it implies **convergence in probability** and the later implies convergence
**convergence in law**. There is also **-convergence** which is stronger than
convergence in probability.

As in the deterministic case, where the **theory of differential equations** is more technical
than the **theory of maps**, building up the formalism for **continuous time stochastic processes**
is more elaborate. Similarly as for differential equations, one has first to prove the existence
of the objects. The most important continuous time stochastic process definitely is **Brownian motion**
. **Standard Brownian motion** is a stochastic process which
satisfies , ,
for and
for any sequence of times,
, the increments
are all independent random vectors with normal distribution. Brownian motion is a solution
of the **stochastic differential equation**
, where
is called **white noise**. Because white noise is only defined as a **generalized function** and
is not a stochastic process by itself, this stochastic differential
equation has to be understood in its integrated form
.

More generally, a solution to a stochastic differential equation
is defined as the solution to the integral equation
. Stochastic differential equations
can be defined in different ways. The expression
can either be defined as an **Ito integral**, which leads to
martingale solutions, or the **Stratonovich integral**, which has similar integration
rules than classical differentiation equations. Examples of stochastic differential equations are
which has the solution
. Or
which has as the solution the process
. The key tool to solve stochastic differential equations is **Ito's
formula**
,
which is the stochastic analog of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
Solutions to stochastic differential equations are examples of **Markov processes** which show diffusion.
Especially, the solutions can be used to solve classical partial differential equations like the
**Dirichlet problem** in a bounded domain with on the boundary . One can
get the solution by computing the expectation of at the end points of Brownian motion starting at
and ending at the boundary
. On a discrete graph, if Brownian motion is
replaced by random walk, the same formula holds too. Stochastic calculus is also useful to interpret quantum
mechanics as a **diffusion processes** [2,1] or as a tool to compute solutions
to quantum mechanical problems using **Feynman-Kac formulas**.

Some features of stochastic process can be described using the language of **Markov operators** ,
which are positive and expectation-preserving transformations on . Examples of such
operators are **Perron-Frobenius operators** for a measure preserving transformation
defining a discrete time evolution or stochastic matrices describing a random walk on a finite graph.
Markov operators can be defined by **transition probability functions** which are measure-valued
random variables. The interpretation is that from a given point , there are different possibilities
to go to. A **transition probability measure**
gives the distribution of the target.
The relation with Markov operators is assured by the **Chapman-Kolmogorov equation**
.
Markov processes can be obtained from **random transformations**, **random walks** or
by **stochastic differential equations**. In the case of a finite or countable target space ,
one obtains **Markov chains** which can be described by **probability matrices** , which
are the simplest Markov operators. For Markov operators, there is an **arrow of time**: the **relative entropy**
with respect to a background measure is non-increasing. Markov processes often are attracted by fixed
points of the Markov operator. Such fixed points are called **stationary states**.
They describe **equilibria** and often they are measures with maximal entropy.
An example is the Markov operator , which assigns to a probability density the
probability density of
where
is the random variable
normalized so that it has mean and variance .
For the initial function , the function is the distribution of
the normalized sum of IID random variables . This Markov operator has a unique
equilibrium point, the **standard normal distribution**. It has maximal entropy among all distributions
on the real line with variance and mean . The central limit theorem tells that the
Markov operator has the normal distribution as a unique attracting fixed point if one takes
the weaker topology of convergence in distribution on . This works in other situations too.
For **circle-valued random variables** for example, the uniform distribution maximizes entropy. It is
not surprising therefore, that there is a central limit theorem for circle-valued random variables
with the uniform distribution as the limiting distribution.

In the same way as mathematics reaches out into other scientific areas, probability theory has
connections with many other branches of mathematics.
The last chapter of these notes give some examples. The section on **percolation**
shows how probability theory can help to understand critical phenomena.
In solid state physics, one considers
**operator-valued random variables**.
The spectrum of random operators are random objects too. One is interested
what happens with probability one. **Localization** is the
phenomenon in solid state physics that sufficiently
random operators often have pure point spectrum.
The section on **estimation theory** gives a glimpse of what mathematical statistics
is about. In statistics one often does not know the probability space itself so that one has to make a
**statistical model** and look at a parameterization of probability spaces. The goal is to give
**maximum likelihood estimates** for the parameters from data and to understand
how small the quadratic estimation error can be made.
A section on **Vlasov dynamics** shows how probability theory appears in problems of **geometric evolution**.
Vlasov dynamics is a generalization of the -body problem to the evolution of
of probability measures. One can look at the evolution of smooth measures or measures located on surfaces.
This deterministic stochastic system produces an evolution of densities which can form singularities
without doing harm to the formalism. It also defines the evolution of surfaces.
The section on moment problems is part of **multivariate statistics**. As for random variables,
random vectors can be described by their **moments**. Since moments define the law of the random variable,
the question arises how one can see from the moments, whether we have a continuous random variable.
The section of **random maps** is an other part of dynamical systems theory. Randomized versions of diffeomorphisms
can be considered idealization of their undisturbed versions. They often can be understood better than their
deterministic versions. For example, many random diffeomorphisms have only finitely many ergodic components.
In the section in **circular random variables**, we see that the **Mises** distribution has extremal
entropy among all circle-valued random variables with given circular mean and variance. There is also
a central limit theorem on the circle: the sum of IID circular random variables converges in law to the
uniform distribution. We then look at a problem in the **geometry of numbers**: how many lattice points
are there in a neighborhood of the graph of one-dimensional Brownian motion? The analysis of this problem
needs a law of large numbers for independent random variables with uniform distribution on :
for
, and
one has
.
Probability theory also matters in complexity theory as a section on **arithmetic random variables**
shows. It turns out that random variables like ,
defined
on finite probability spaces become independent in the limit . Such considerations matter
in **complexity** theory: arithmetic functions defined on large but finite sets behave very much like
random functions. This is reflected by the fact that the inverse of arithmetic functions is in general
difficult to compute and belong to the complexity class of NP. Indeed, if one could invert arithmetic
functions easily, one could solve problems like factoring integers fast.
A short section on **Diophantine equations** indicates how the distribution of random variables can shed
light on the solution of **Diophantine equations**. Finally, we look
at a topic in **harmonic analysis** which was initiated by Norbert Wiener.
It deals with the relation of the characteristic function and the
continuity properties of the random variable .

1) **Bertrand's paradox (Bertrand 1889) **

We throw at random lines onto the unit disc.
What is the probability that the line intersects the disc with
a length , the length of the inscribed equilateral
triangle?

**First answer:** take an arbitrary point on the boundary of the disc. The set of
all lines through that point are parameterized by an angle . In
order that the chord is longer than , the line has to lie within
a sector of within a range of . The probability is .

**Second answer:** take all lines perpendicular to a fixed diameter.
The chord is longer than if the point of intersection
lies on the middle half of the diameter. The probability is .

**Third answer:** if the midpoints of the chords lie in a
disc of radius , the chord
is longer than . Because the disc has a radius which is
half the radius of the unit disc, the probability is .

Like most paradoxes in mathematics, a part of the question in Bertrand's problem
is not well defined. Here it is the term "random line". The solution of the
paradox lies in the fact that the three answers depend
on the **chosen probability distribution**. There are several "natural"
distributions. The actual answer depends on how the experiment is performed.

2) **Petersburg paradox (D.Bernoulli, 1738)**

In the Petersburg casino, you pay an entrance fee and you
get the prize , where is the number of times, the casino flips
a coin until "head" appears. For example, if the sequence
of coin experiments would give "tail, tail, tail, head", you would
win , the win minus the entrance fee. Fair would be an
entrance fee which is equal to the expectation of the win, which is

The paradox is that nobody would agree to pay even an entrance fee .

The problem with this casino is that it is not quite clear, what is "fair".
For example, the situation is so improbable that it never occurs in
the life-time of a person. Therefore, for any practical reason, one has not
to worry about large values of . This, as well as the finiteness of money
resources is the reason, why casinos do not have to worry about the following
bullet proof **martingale strategy**
in roulette: bet dollars on red. If you win, stop, if you lose,
bet dollars on red. If you win, stop. If you lose, bet dollars
on red. Keep doubling the bet. Eventually after steps, red will occur
and you will win
dollars. This example
motivates the concept of martingales.
Theorem () or proposition ()
will shed some light on this. Back to the Petersburg paradox. How does one
resolve it? What would be a reasonable entrance fee in
"real life"? Bernoulli proposed to replace the expectation of
the profit with the expectation
, where
is called a **utility function**.
This would lead to a fair entrance

It is not so clear if that is a way out of the paradox because for any proposed utility function , one can modify the casino rule so that the paradox reappears: pay if the utility function or pay dollars, if the utility function is . Such reasoning plays a role in economics and social sciences.

The picture to the right shows the average profit development during a typical tournament of 4000 Petersburg games. After these 4000 games, the player would have lost about 10 thousand dollars, when paying a 10 dollar entrance fee each game. The player would have to play a very, very long time to catch up. Mathematically, the player will do so and have a profit in the long run, but it is unlikely that it will happen in his or her life time.

3) **The three door problem (1991)**
Suppose you're on a game show and you are given a choice of three
doors. Behind one door is a car and behind the others are goats. You
pick a door-say No. 1 - and the host, who knows what's behind the doors,
opens another door-say, No. 3-which has a goat. (In all games, he
opens a door to reveal a goat). He then says to you, "Do you want to
pick door No. 2?" (In all games he always offers an option to switch).
Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

The problem is also called "Monty Hall problem" and
was discussed by Marilyn vos Savant in a "Parade" column
in 1991 and provoked a big controversy. (See [3] for
pointers and similar examples.)
The problem is that intuitive argumentation can easily lead to the conclusion
that it does not matter whether to change the door or not. Switching the door
doubles the chances to win:

**No switching:** you choose a door and win with probability 1/3. The opening
of the host does not affect any more your choice.

**Switching:** when choosing the door with the car, you loose since you switch.
If you choose a door with a goat. The host opens the other door with the goat
and you win. There are two such cases, where you win.
The probability to win is 2/3.

4) **The Banach-Tarski paradox (1924)**

It is possible to cut the standard unit ball
into 5 disjoint pieces
and rotate and translate
the pieces with transformations so that
and
is a second unit ball
and all the transformed sets again
don't intersect.

While this example of Banach-Tarski is spectacular, the existence of bounded subsets of the circle
for which one can not assign a translational invariant probability can already be achieved
in one dimension.
The Italian mathematician **Giuseppe Vitali** gave in 1905 the following example: define an
equivalence relation on the circle
by saying that two angles are **equivalent**
if is a rational
angle. Let be a subset in the circle which contains exactly one number from each equivalence
class. The **axiom of choice** assures the existence of . If
is a enumeration of the
set of rational angles in the circle, then the sets are pairwise disjoint and satisfy
. If we could assign a translational invariant probability
to , then the basic rules of probability would give

But there is no real number which makes this possible.

Both the Banach-Tarski as well as Vitalis result shows that one can not hope
to define a probability space on the algebra of **all** subsets of the unit ball or
the unit circle such that the probability measure is translational and rotational invariant.
The natural concepts of "length" or "volume", which are rotational and translational invariant
only makes sense for a smaller algebra. This will lead to the notion of -algebra.
In the context of topological spaces like Euclidean spaces, it leads to
**Borel -algebras**, algebras of sets generated by the compact sets of the
topological space. This language will be developed in the next chapter.

Probability theory is a central topic in mathematics. There are close
relations and intersections with other fields like computer science,
ergodic theory and dynamical systems, cryptology, game theory,
analysis, partial differential equation, mathematical physics,
economical sciences, statistical mechanics and even number theory.
As a motivation, we give some problems and topics which
can be treated with probabilistic methods.

1) **Random walks**:
(statistical mechanics, gambling, stock markets, quantum field theory).

Assume you walk through a lattice. At each vertex, you choose a direction
at random. What is the probability that you return back to your starting point?
Polya's theorem () says that in two
dimensions, a random walker almost
certainly returns to the origin arbitrarily often, while in three dimensions,
the walker with probability only returns a finite number of times and then
escapes for ever.

A random walk in one dimensions displayed as a graph

2) **Percolation problems**
(model of a porous medium, statistical mechanics, critical phenomena).

Each bond of a rectangular lattice in the plane is connected with probability
and disconnected with probability . Two lattice points in the lattice are
in the same **cluster**, if there is a path from to .
One says that **"percolation occurs"** if there is
a positive probability that an infinite cluster appears.
One problem is to find the **critical probability** , the
infimum of all , for which percolation occurs. The problem can be
extended to situations, where the switch probabilities are not
independent to each other. Some random variables like the size of the largest
cluster are of interest near the critical probability .

A variant of bond percolation is **site percolation** where the nodes of the lattice
are switched on with probability .

Generalized percolation problems are obtained, when the independence of the
individual nodes is relaxed. A class of such **dependent percolation** problems can be obtained by
choosing two irrational numbers like
and
and switching the node on if
. The
probability of switching a node on is again , but the random variables

are no more independent.

Even more general percolation problems are obtained, if also the distribution of the
random variables can depend on the position .

3) **Random Schrödinger operators**.
(quantum mechanics, functional analysis, disordered systems, solid state physics)

Consider the linear map
on the space of
sequences
.
We assume that takes random values in . The function is called
the potential. The problem is to determine the spectrum or spectral type of the infinite
matrix on the **Hilbert space**
of all sequences with finite
. The
operator is the Hamiltonian of an electron in a one-dimensional disordered crystal.
The spectral properties of have a relation with the **conductivity** properties
of the crystal. Of special interest is the situation, where the values are all
independent random variables.
It turns out that if are IID random variables with a continuous distribution,
there are many eigenvalues for the infinite dimensional matrix - at least with
probability . This phenomenon is called **localization**.

A wave evolving in a random potential at . Shown are both the potential and the wave A wave evolving in a random potential at . Shown are both the potential and the wave A wave evolving in a random potential at . Shown are both the potential and the wave

More general operators are obtained by allowing to be random variables with the
same distribution but where one does not persist on independence any more. A well studied
example is the **almost Mathieu operator**, where
and for which is irrational.

4) **Classical dynamical systems**
(celestial mechanics, fluid dynamics, mechanics, population models)

The study of deterministic dynamical systems like the **logistic map**
on the interval or the **three body problem** in
celestial mechanics has shown that such systems or subsets of it can behave like random systems.
Many effects can be described by **ergodic theory**, which
can be seen as a brother of probability theory. Many results
in probability theory generalize to the more general setup of
ergodic theory. An example is **Birkhoff's ergodic theorem**
which generalizes the law of large numbers.

Iterating the logistic map

on produces independent random variables. The invariant measure is continuous. The simple mechanical system of a double pendulum exhibits complicated dynamics. The differential equation defines a measure preserving flow on a probability A short time evolution of the Newtonian three body problem. There are energies and subsets of the energy surface which are invariant and on which there is an invariant probability measure.

Given a dynamical system given by a map or a flow on a subset of some Euclidean space,
one obtains for every invariant probability measure a probability space
.
An observed quantity like a coordinate of an individual particle is a random variable and defines
a stochastic process
. For many dynamical systems including also some
3 body problems, there are invariant measures and observables for which are IID random variables.
Probability theory is therefore intrinsically relevant also in classical dynamical systems.

5) **Cryptology**.
(computer science, coding theory, data encryption)

Coding theory deals with the mathematics of encrypting codes or deals with the
design of error correcting codes. Both aspects of coding theory have important
applications. A good code can repair loss of information due to bad channels and
hide the information in an encrypted way. While many aspects of coding theory are
based in discrete mathematics, number theory, algebra and algebraic geometry, there
are probabilistic and combinatorial aspects to the problem. We illustrate this
with the example of a public key encryption algorithm whose security is based on
the fact that it is hard to factor a large integer
into its prime factors but easy to verify that are factors, if
one knows them. The number can be public but only the
person, who knows the factors can read the message. Assume, we want to crack
the code and find the factors and .

The simplest method is to try to find the factors by trial and error but this is
impractical already if has 50 digits. We would have to search through
numbers to find the factor . This corresponds to probe 100 million times every second over a
time span of 15 billion years. There are better methods known and we want to illustrate one
of them now: assume we want to find the factors of
.
The method goes as follows: start with an integer and iterate the
quadratic map
on
. If we assume the
numbers
to be random, how many such numbers do we have to
generate, until two of them are the same modulo one of the prime factors ?
The answer is surprisingly small and based on the **birthday paradox**:
the probability that in a group of 23 students, two of them have the
same birthday is larger than : the probability of the event that we have
no birthday match is
, so that the probability of
a birthday match is
. This is larger than .
If we apply this thinking to the sequence of numbers generated by the
**pseudo random number generator** , then we expect to have a chance of for finding
a match modulo in iterations. Because
, we have to try
numbers, to get a factor: if and are the same modulo ,
then
produces the factor of . In the above
example of the 46 digit number , there is a prime factor . The
Pollard algorithm finds this factor with probability in steps.
This is an estimate only which gives the order of magnitude. With the above ,
if we start with and take , then we have a match
.
It can be found very fast.

This probabilistic argument would give a rigorous probabilistic estimate if we would pick truly
random numbers. The algorithm of course generates such numbers in a **deterministic** way
and they are not truly random. The generator is called a **pseudo random number generator**.
It produces numbers which are random in the sense that many statistical tests can not
distinguish them from true random numbers. Actually, many random number generators built into
computer operating systems and programming languages are pseudo random number generators.

Probabilistic thinking is often involved in designing, investigating and
attacking data encryption codes or random number generators.

6) **Numerical methods**.
(integration, Monte Carlo experiments, algorithms)

In applied situations, it is often very difficult to find integrals
directly. This happens for example in statistical mechanics or
quantum electrodynamics, where one wants to find integrals in spaces
with a large number of dimensions. One can nevertheless compute
numerical values using **Monte Carlo Methods** with a manageable
amount of effort. Limit theorems assure that these numerical values
are reasonable. Let us illustrate this with a very simple but famous example,
the **Buffon needle problem**.

A **stick** of length 2 is thrown onto the plane filled with
parallel lines, all of which are distance apart. If the center of the stick
falls within distance of a line, then the interval of angles
leading to an intersection with a grid line has length
among a possible range of angles .
The probability of hitting a line is therefore
.
This leads to a Monte Carlo method to compute . Just throw randomly sticks onto
the plane and count the number of times, it hits a line. The
number is an approximation of . This is of course not an effective way
to compute but it illustrates the principle.

The Buffon needle problem is a Monte Carlo method to
compute . By counting the number of hits in a sequence
of experiments, one can get random approximations of .
The **law of large numbers** assures that the approximations will
converge to the expected limit. All Monte Carlo computations are theoretically
based on limit theorems.